Pros And Cons Of Health Care Reform - Healthcare Reform: How Doctors and Nurses View Universal Care and Current Reform
Good evening. Today, I found out about Pros And Cons Of Health Care Reform - Healthcare Reform: How Doctors and Nurses View Universal Care and Current Reform. Which may be very helpful to me and you. Healthcare Reform: How Doctors and Nurses View Universal Care and Current ReformBackground:
What I said. It just isn't in conclusion that the real about Pros And Cons Of Health Care Reform. You see this article for information about that need to know is Pros And Cons Of Health Care Reform.Pros And Cons Of Health Care Reform
Even with a bill passed in both houses of Congress, Healthcare reform and the issue of a universal or national healthcare principles continues to dominate discussions on the hill. There is talk of repealing the bill and potentially leaving millions more Americans vulnerable and uninsured. Some argue that repeal is for the best because the current bill gives the government too much power and circumvents our individual possession and freedoms. Still others argue that the bill does not go far sufficient to grant every particular American the right to healthcare services. These views are polarizing both the Representatives on Capitol Hill and their constituents who live on main-street.
Nurses and physicians work in the field taking care of the insured, the under-insured, and the uninsured. These healthcare professionals see first-hand how the capability to pay for healthcare services shape people's perception of illness and their willingness to seek healing assistance in a timely manner. Given how highly expensed the issue is, it is leading to know what these nurses and doctors think of all the hoopla that still surrounds the issue of healthcare.
Healthcare Workers' Viewpoint:
The opinions in this narrative are those expressed by the nurses and physicians at a Dallas hospital. For confidentiality reasons the names of said nurses and physicians, as well as, the name of the Dallas area hospital where they work will not be used. Based on their contact in the system, these healthcare workers pointed out their frustrations with the current system, reform, and universal healthcare. The issue is healthcare reform and universal healthcare. How do nurses and doctors view this?
Cons:
On the other hand, there are some nurses and physicians who vehemently oppose the idea of universal healthcare and reform that have been passed. These healthcare workers state the following:
Healthcare is not a right. It is the accountability of each individual to work hard and pay for the care they require. Many citizen do not think their hard earned money should be syphoned to take care of individuals who are not pulling their own weight. A principles that provides healthcare for all rewards citizen who are not contributing members of society. Even more, those who oppose healthcare reform and universal healthcare insist that it is not their place to take care of individuals who are lagging in their duties to self and society. These citizen become a drag on the system. Universal healthcare encourages the weaker members of society to stay weak and non-productive. If citizen had to pay for the services they receive, they are motivated to find work and everyone wins. Paying for such a principles will wish an increase in taxation. This means more money taken from hard working Americans; money they can use to take care of their families, co-pays and deductions, as well as anything they think necessary. Increased taxation also limits funds available during retirement. Some physicians and nurses believe that Medicare is a blithe on the healthcare system. In a free shop society, guarnatee clubs should be allowed to compete freely without a government run principles that undermines the free market. Ideally, a free shop will take care of pricing and completion will sacrifice the unabridged cost of healthcare. Hospitals and guarnatee clubs that meet the demands of society will prevail. citizen who work hard will have access to healthcare services. It is coarse knowledge that physicians in the United States earn more than physicians in other industrial nations. unabridged training and hard work is rewarded by respectable pay checks. Many worry that their living standards will drop if a national healthcare principles is passed. Moreover, current reform advocates preventative care which may live clear specialties out of the loop. After years of training to be of assistance to society, these specialties may become obsolete. Many citizen like to know that if they are insured, the care they need will be available to them when it is needed. It is perceived that extending healthcare benefits to all will lead to long waiting lines and if this were the case, many individuals are rightfully afraid of the cost to their lives and capability of living.
Pros:
Patients are more likely to get preventive care if they are insured. Healthcare services cost a lot of money. Many citizen have been bankrupted as a direct effect of their inability to pay healing bills, which include hospital stay, doctor and auxiliary care visits (home condition nurses & therapists), as well as, pharmaceutical aids and healing supplies. This means that the condition and financial well-being of patients are affected by any laws that offer improved access to healthcare services. Preventative care saves hospitals and tax-payers money. Although not a traditional concern for nurses, they were quick to point out that the under-insured and uninsured patients who make it to the hospital only arrive when they are so sick that they may never be wholly healed from a disease that could have been prevented with the right out-patient care. Due to the developed progression of their illness upon admission, these patients stay longer in hospitals and sass less to conventional therapies. The effect is a very high cost for the care provided. Since these individuals cannot pay, in many instances, the hospitals are stuck with the bills. In order to pay off debts accrued the hospitals increase the cost of care for those who can pay. It is a logical explication that now affects law abiding tax payers which could have been prevented. People that are chronically ill cannot work and pay for healthcare. Some end up homeless and become society's question relying on assistance from inexpressive parties or city government. If everyone was insured, many citizen who wish frequent healing care will be taken care of, thus reducing the number of homeless citizen in society. The U.S. Is the only industrial nation that does not offer healthcare coverage to all its people. In a principles that relies solely on profit motivated guarnatee clubs to furnish compensation, access to clear needed therapies become microscopic if they are not stylish by the patient's guarnatee company. These used to be most prevalent with the introduction of Hmos and have since improved. Still it is a stain many organizations prefer not to discuss. As citizen whose sole presuppose for being is the care of patients it is no wonder that many will like a principles where recompense did not play such an indelible role.
Conclusion:
Overall, during the interview process that led to this article, it became apparent that most healthcare workers opinions on access to healthcare were greatly influenced by the role they played in the care of their patients. It was quite apparent that the nurse's role as outpatient advocate greatly influenced their view on healthcare reform and a universal healthcare system. An remarkable number of nurses were in withhold of a principles that offered coverage to every outpatient that walked through the hospital doors. Physicians, who were more likely to voice concerns over structure, efficacy, and compensation, were less likely to furnish withhold of a principles that will drastically change the existing landscape.
Source:
To reprint or post on your website, please include author signature data listed below at the end of this article:
0 comments:
Post a Comment